If you are an Existing User, please enter your Username & Password below

Forgot Password?


Are you a New User? Click here to enrol

close

Click here to visit old website
Co-Sponsors
SOURCE : NEWSPAPER ADS RELEASED BY FIU STOCK EXCHANGE LTD.

SOURCE OF INFORMATION : MINISTRY OF FINANCE - FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT
PERIOD COVERED : 14-FEB-2013 TO 30-APR-2026

NAMES IN BROWN COLOUR
Names of entities/persons in brown colour denote that the regulatory order is not against them but their names have been mentioned only for association purposes.

COMPANIES: IMPOSED FINE

S.No. ENTITY PERSONS REGULATORY CHARGES REGULATORY ACTION(S) / DATE OF ORDER FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS
41
History of entity/person IIFL SECURITIES LTD.  
  DID NOT HAVE IN PLACE WELL-DEFINED INCOME RANGES AND NET-WORTH INFORMATION WHICH WOULD FACILITATE TRANSACTION MONITORING AND REPORTING

DID NOT PROPERLY RAISE ALERTS AND CONSIDER ADVERSE ORDERS OF SEBI FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AML TRANSACTIONAL MONITORING AND REPORTING OBLIGATIONS  
DIRECTED TO FILE CERTIFICATION UNDER SIGNATURE OF DESIGNATED DIRECTOR AND PRINCIPAL OFFICER THAT DIRECTED MEASURES WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE PERIOD PRESCRIBED

IMPOSED FINE RS.1,00,000

21-OCT-2022
42
History of entity/person INDIAN BANK  
  DID NOT EVOLVE INTERNAL MECHANISM TO REPORT INTEGRALLY CONNECTED TRANSACTIONS   IMPOSED FINE RS.1,00,000

03-SEP-2015
NOT APPEARING IN THE LIST DATED 30-JUN-2018
43
History of entity/person INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK  
  DID NOT EVOLVE INTERNAL MECHANISM TO REPORT INTEGRALLY CONNECTED TRANSACTIONS   IMPOSED FINE RS.2,00,000

01-OCT-2015
NOT APPEARING IN THE LIST DATED 30-JUN-2018
44
History of entity/person INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK  
  DID NOT FILE CERTAIN THRESHOLD BASED REPORTS WITHIN TIMELINE VIOLATING SECTIONS 12 AND 12A OF PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT, 2002 READ WITH RULES 3,4,5,7 AND 8 OF PML (MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS) RULES, 2005

DID NOT IMPLEMENT EFFECTIVE INTERNAL MECHANISM TO REPORT SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS REPORTS ETC VIOLATING SECTION SECTIONS 12 AND 12A OF PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT, 2002 READ WITH RULES 3,4,5,7 AND 8 OF PML (MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS) RULES, 2005  
IMPOSED FINE RS.10,40,000

29-JUL-2019
45
History of entity/person INDICA TRAVEL & TOURS PVT.LTD.  
  DID NOT APPOINT DESIGNATED DIRECTOR AND PRINCIPAL OFFICER AS REQUIRED UNDER RULE OF 7(1) PML (MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS) RULES, 2005

DID NOT EVOLVE INTERNAL MECHANISM TO DETECT AND REPORT SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS  
IMPOSED FINE RS.1,00,000

WARNED/DIRECTED TO PAY DUE

31-OCT-2022
46
History of entity/person INDUSIND BANK LTD.  
  DID NOT EVOLVE INTERNAL MECHANISM TO REPORT INTEGRALLY CONNECTED TRANSACTIONS   IMPOSED FINE RS.4,00,000

30-SEP-2015
NOT APPEARING IN THE LIST DATED 30-JUN-2018
47
History of entity/person ING VYSYA BANK LTD.  
  DID NOT EVOLVE INTERNAL MECHANISM TO REPORT INTEGRALLY CONNECTED TRANSACTIONS   IMPOSED FINE RS.3,00,000

04-SEP-2015
NOT APPEARING IN THE LIST DATED 30-JUN-2018
48
History of entity/person JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD.,THE  
  DID NOT FILE REPORT MANDATED BY ALERT ISSUED UNDER SECTION 12A OF PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT, 2002   IMPOSED FINE RS.2,00,000

18-DEC-2020
49
History of entity/person JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD.,THE  
  DID NOT FILE SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS REPORTS (STRS)

DID NOT CONDUCT ROBUST KNOW YOUR CLIENTS (KYC) AND DUE DILIGENCE OF CUSTOMER’S ACCOUNT  
IMPOSED FINE RS.3,00,000

01-NOV-2022
50
History of entity/person JHARKHAND STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.  
  DID NOT HAVE EFFECTIVE INTERNAL MECHANISM TO DETECT AND REPORT OF SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS VIOLATING RULE 5(2) AND 7(3) OF PML (MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS) RULES, 2005   IMPOSED FINE RS.14,40,000

09-MAY-2019
51
History of entity/person JOWAI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.  
  DID NOT FILE REPORT MANDATED BY ALERT ISSUED UNDER SECTION 12A OF PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT, 2002   IMPOSED FINE RS.4,00,000

06-APR-2021
52
History of entity/person KODOLI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.  
  DID NOT EVOLVE EFFECTIVE INTERNAL MECHANISM TO DETECT AND REPORT OF CASH TRANSACTIONS VIOLATING UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE ACT. READ WITH RULES 3(1)(A), 3(1)(B), 5(2), 7(2), 7(3) AND 7(4) OF PML (MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS) RULES, 2005

DELAY IN FILING OF CASH TRANSACTION REPORTS (CTRS)  
IMPOSED FINE RS.4,60,000

11-FEB-2022
53
History of entity/person KONARK URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,THE  
  DID NOT PUT IN PLACE EFFECTIVE INTERNAL MECHANISM TO DETECT AND REPORT SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS REPORTS (STRS)   IMPOSED FINE RS.1,00,000

27-OCT-2020
54
History of entity/person LATUR URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.  
    IMPOSED FINE RS.90,000

29-APR-2014
NOT APPEARING IN THE LIST DATED 30-JUN-2018
55
History of entity/person LOKMANYA MULTIPURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY  
  DID NOT HAVE PROPER SYSTEM TO DETECT AND REPORT CASH TRANSACTION REPORTS (CTRS) AND/OR SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS REPORTS (STRS)

DID NOT REPORT CASH TRANSACTIONS AND/OR DELAY IN REPORTING CASH TRANSACTIONS REPORT

FILED INVALID LARGE NUMBER OF CASH TRANSACTIONS REPORT (CTRS)  
IMPOSED FINE RS.1,00,000

DIRECTED TO RE-EXAMINE SYSTEM FOR DETECTING AND REPORTING SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS

31-OCT-2022
56
History of entity/person MAHAMEDHA URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.  
  DID NOT REPORT CASH TRANSACTIONS AND/OR DELAY IN REPORTING CASH TRANSACTIONS REPORT   IMPOSED FINE RS.97,00,000

08-APR-2016
NOT APPEARING IN THE LIST DATED 30-JUN-2018
57
History of entity/person MAHILA VIKAS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.  
  DID NOT FURNISH ALL REPORTABLE TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING INTEGRALLY CONNECTED TRANSANCTIONS   IMPOSED FINE RS.79,60,000

08-APR-2016
NOT APPEARING IN THE LIST DATED 30-JUN-2018
58
History of entity/person MEHSANA URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,THE  
  DID NOT HAVE EFFECTIVE MECHANISM TO DETECT SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS   IMPOSED FINE RS.1,00,000

29-JAN-2021
59
History of entity/person MIZORAM URBAN CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD.  
  DID NOT FILE REPORTS ON TIME AS MANDATED BY ALERT ISSUED UNDER SECTION 12A OF PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT, 2002   IMPOSED FINE RS.4,00,000

26-AUG-2020
60
History of entity/person MOTILAL OSWAL COMMODITIES BROKER PVT.LTD.  
  DID NOT PROPERLY RAISE ALERTS AND CONSIDER ADVERSE ORDERS OF SEBI FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AML TRANSACTIONAL MONITORING AND REPORTING OBLIGATIONS

DID NOT PROPERLY RAISE, INVESTIGATE ALERTS AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION AS REQUIRED BY LAW WHERE INCOME DETAILS OF THE CLIENTS WERE AT SUBSTANTIAL VARIANCE WITH TRADING VALUES/VOLUMES  
IMPOSED FINE RS.1,00,000

21-OCT-2022
The regulatory charges/regulatory actions may be fully or partly applicable to the entities/persons mentioned in the second column.
 
First Previous Next Last  
Page 3 of 6  
top